AC Models - ANZAC Horseman WWI

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dan Morton

A Fixture
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
8,004
Location
Great Plains of the Midwest, Omaha, Nebraska, USA,
First of all I want to thank Andy Cairns for asking me to review his 90mm scale ANZAC Horseman. I’m honored and pleased that he would consider me. Andy has generously helped me many times with my sculpting and I consider him a friend. In doing any review, as I told Andy, I believe all of us strive for accuracy and honest opinions. So - here we go.
I enjoy Andy's sculpting, particularly his portrayal of clothing drapery and folds. These are very well done on this kit. The fit of the parts in the kit are impressively precise. They all go together easily and firmly.

Second, because I know how much work he must have put into it, I want to be as positive as possible. However, I regret that there are things about the kit that trouble me.
The horse is powerful, heavily muscled like a plow horse, not a leaner, sinewy riding horse. He’s a beautiful brute! The horse Andy sculpted would look fine pulling in an artillery team or a GS wagon, but I don’t think he looks right as a riding horse. Oh sure, you could ride it, but I don’t think a cavalryman would normally do so. An army would put that kind of horse to work hauling something. The casting of the horse has a bit of flash, but nothing serious.

The saddle is cast as one piece with a separate u-shaped rolled blanket and leather bag to be fitted over the saddle cantle. They fit on the horse and on each other tightly.

Third, the head of the figure looks anatomically just a little too small for the rest of the body. At first I thought the body itself was out of proportion, but it is just the head. And the head isn’t out by much, but it is noticeable. There are three hats - a pith helmet, an Aussie slouch hat and a New Zealand slouch hat - all beautifully done. On the figure, there are minor amounts of flash and casting waste to contend with and I would sand smooth and re-line one of the trouser seams. Nothing seriously wrong in the casting of the figure or the hats. The lower arms and hands are cast separately to allow proper adjustment for reins. A large piece of lead foil is included to make the rifle sling and the reins. The SMLE rifle is accurate and well done with minimal flash.

I believe Andy intended the kit to be adaptable/convert-able by the modeler to become a particular New Zealand or Australian cavalry regiment. As it is, it doesn’t portray either one, but conversion is possible without a huge amount of work. Personally I wouldn’t have chosen that approach - I would have made one or the other.

I don’t like the fact that there are no instructions. One of my favorite sculptors and kit makers, Jon Smith, is, in my opinion, the best in the business about this. He provides not only instructions, but a very accurate, simple history and painting recommendations for every figure kit.

Please note that the kit photos above can be increased in size by double-clicking on them. I'm attaching some photos of re-enactors - Light Horsemen and NZ Mounted Rifles - to [hopefully] give you modelling ideas! :)

Finally, I should probably mention that I showed an earlier version of this review to Andy and he wanted me to post it even with the critique.

All the best,
Dan
 

Attachments

  • Andy-2.jpg
    Andy-2.jpg
    263.6 KB
  • Andy-1.JPG
    Andy-1.JPG
    261.9 KB
  • Reenactor - 1914 kit.jpg
    Reenactor - 1914 kit.jpg
    56.1 KB
  • Reenactors at parade in 1997.jpg
    Reenactors at parade in 1997.jpg
    74 KB
  • Australian Light Horse 1918 front view.jpg
    Australian Light Horse 1918 front view.jpg
    43.8 KB
  • Otago Mounted Rifleman.jpg
    Otago Mounted Rifleman.jpg
    16.1 KB
  • NZMR reinforcements kit.jpg
    NZMR reinforcements kit.jpg
    43.3 KB
Hi Dan
thats a good looking kit.
Thanks for the review.
Since I've got the first reply in and as a KIWI, when you get him built please please please do him as a New Zealander
(grovelling over)
Can't wait to see him built.

Chris
 
Sorry to say, I would like to see more photos of the Rider as well as the saddle. Even enlarging the photos does not show the sides of the rider and seam lines that may be there. It is not often we see a review of one of Andy's kits and I feel its more a review of the references than the kit itself.
 
Morning men....
A wee nite pick Dan he!he!!neither the Kiwi or Aussies where cavalry, but mounted infantry who rode into battle then moved forward on foot to engage who ever...both often fought together and saved each others bacon.....but fought each other in the pub as you do...
As for what horses the Kiwis used, more often than not they brought their horses with them from NZ. mostly they rode Hacks, or New Zealand stock horses roughly about 14 1/2 to 15 hands high but not a lot heaver than the Waler.....
lt reads as if a wee nip and tuck here and there one could really make this into a great looking piece...

..Phil...
 
Dear Phil,

The Light Horse were mounted infantry. Quite right and I stand corrected! Duh!

And thanks for the info on the NZ horses. Yes, I think it's fair that this could be a great kit. Sounds like with the horse if you used a Waler as a reference for both or either, you'd be 90% there. I think the existing horse could be largely cut down to fit. It would be tricky but do-able. First, I would ask the folks on the Military Horse Forum for several full size reference measurements. As you make adjustments on the horse, you'd have to take some care with the saddle shape and size also.

Incidentally, may I also add that Lindsay Baly's "Horseman, Pass By" by a Light Horseman, Trooper Byron (Jack) Baly, #1079, is one of the finest Great War reads ever? Great memoir, lovingly edited and very readable!

All the best,
Dan
 
Hi Dan,

Phil beat me to it mate.

The difference between Cavalry and Mounted Infantry in WW1 is subtle but important from a tactical and historical perspective. The most obvious difference is that cavalry fought on horseback with sword and lance, whereas light horse dismounted to fight on the ground with the standard infantryman's rifle, the .303 and a 17 inch bayonet.

Waler horses were exported from Australia throughout the 19th Century to many far flung places around the British Empire. Almost certainly the horses that carried those poor *******s in the Charge of the Light Brigade in 1854 were Australian bred Waler horses. The Indian Army Cavalry Regiments rode Waler horses exclusively for many decades, and even the King Edward VII rode a magestic black Waler.

The name Waler comes from New South Wales, where the breed was first developed for use as a stock horse. On average the Waler is 14-16 hands and was regarded by English Cavalry officers as a rather "light" horse, hence the name Australian Light Horse.

The origins of the breed are somewhat unclear, but it was believed to have emerged in the 1830's as a result of breeding an English Thoroughbred with mares that were part draft horse, part Welsh Pony and part Timor Pony. They were bred for their stamina,toughness and ability to work in hard, dry, hot conditions. These proved to be exactly the qualities needed for desert warfare in the Middle East.

Walers were transported to South Africa during the Boer War and ridden by British and colonial cavalry and light horse troops against the Boer commandos. A great many Waler were shipped to New Zealand, for both military and civilian purposes, so it's quite likely many of the mounts ridden by New Zealand Mounted Rifle regiments were Walers or had been bred from Walers.

It is also very likely that most NZMR remounts (replacement horses) were Walers, given the very large numbers of horses Australia was already bringing to the Middle East and the synergies between the ANZAC Desert Mounted Corps under the command of Lt Gen Harry Chauvel.

Because of Australia's very strict quarantine laws, only one of the 160,000 Walers sent to the Middle East or Europe returned home after the war (I'll share that story with you some other time). Rather than leave their beloved Walers to the Arabs, most Australian Lighthorsemen thought it more humane to shoot their horses before returning to Australia at the end of the war. As a consequence the breed was almost wiped out, however they have slowly recovered their numbers over the decades and their bloodlines are now protected as part of a national heritage horse project undertaken by many volunteers around Australia. My wife and I are two such volunteers.

Pure bred Walers can still be found running wild in large brumby mobs across the vast, empty expanses of outback Australia. They are the modern descendents of probably the most famous battle horse of modern times.

As for the horse in Andy's kit; I'm sorry to say I agree with Dan. It does not look like a Waler to me.
 

Attachments

  • waler.jpg
    waler.jpg
    43 KB
  • H5.jpg
    H5.jpg
    55 KB
  • Tony on Roxby.JPG
    Tony on Roxby.JPG
    259 KB
Mate,..
love old Roxby,great colour,..but whats he doing with the heavy cavalry,sorry cob he!he!..great photo.....

your old mate Phil...
 
Roxby may be a "Light" Horse, but his rider is definitely heavy cavalry.:D

His colour is called buckskin, and such horses were usually ridden by officers, whereas the more common bay coloured horses (chestnut brown/ orange) were ridden by enlisted troopers.

The different coloured horses helped identify the rider at a distance.;)

At least I can still get on a horse mate.:p
 
Back
Top