Cavalry charges, vs Impact! (Comparison)

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Tubby-Nuts2

A Fixture
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
3,343
Location
Nth East London
Hello guys, this may not be to everyone's interest, But!

I have just received, a bust of the, 'Australian Light Horse', and was checking the shoulder patch colour's! .. However, once that was sorted. I found myself comparing the feats of the 'Aussie L/H',. to that of the 'Light Brigade'. of 1854. So, 800 Horsemen, ..and 600 Horsemen! respectively.

Now this is what I cannot get my head around! ..every one has heard of the 'Charge of the Light Brigade'. (Those over the age of 30):rolleyes:. With the 600! and the casualties sustained, but not overly so the 800 'Aussies and Tasmanians'! at 'Beersheba'. ??, whose casualties were unbelievably light. (given the modern weaponry and similar distance). However, the latter had far more powerful geo-political and demographic impact than the former! Yet this feat of arms seems to go un-recognised. Which I find absolutely weird, and just wrong !. :)

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...&mid=61A8C74C3869480A4E4861A8C74C3869480A4E48

Yes I know the film.

Regards,

Mark.
 
Well Mark, you didn't expect me NOT to respond did you?:D

The capture of Beersheba on 31 October 1917 was a significant strategic victory in a series of battles that were fought through Palestine over a period of 2 years. The fall of Beersheba was critical to the capture of Gaza and the eventual fall of Damascus, which saw the Ottoman and German forces in the region reduced to a fraction of their former size. The main objective was of course to keep the Suez Canal and Egypt in the hands of Britain so it could maintain trade with its Imperial colonies in the Far East.

The roll of the Light Horse in capturing Beersheba has been immortalised in the movie "The Lighthorseman", but Beersheba was just one small battle in a string of such battles, and it wasn't necessarily the best victory in military terms. It was an overwhelming victory made all the more remarkable by the light casualties experienced by the 800 Light Horse in their famous charge, but in its size, scale and outcome it pales in comparison to the battles on the Western Front that were happening at the same time and were dominating headlines in newspapers around the world.

Yes, its wrong that this battle has not received the recognition it deserves, but to be fair, the entire Middle East theatre of operations in WW1 (including the disastrous Gallipoli Campaign) was a sideshow of limited strategic significance when compared to the events on the Western Front, and has never received the recognition it deserves.

Alfred, Lord Tennyson did a wonderful thing when he wrote the "The Charge of the Light Brigade" in 1854. He immortalised the courage and the sacrifice of the men of the Light Brigade in a poem that became a classic of its era and has echoed down the generations as a reminder of the futility of war. In doing so he created a legend that romanticised the notion of heroic sacrifice, and this notion has been used to lure eager young men into uniform and off to battle ever since. It also fitted neatly into the Victorian image of England as a nation of brave and fearless young men who would gladly lay down their lives for Queen and Country and the glory of the Empire.

Their was no such mood for romanticised heroic sacrifice in Australia after WW1. The sacrifice of our men in France and Belgium had been enormous, the country was in deep mourning for our losses, and the returned men themselves were deeply traumatised from their experiences and unwilling to share their recollections of the battles they had fought. The actions of the Light Horse in the Middle East had been over shadowed by the deeds of the ANZAC Corps, which had played a vital role in many of the most important battles of 1917-18 and which had been proven to be some of the most effective fighting forces (along with the Canadians) on the entire Western Front.

A number of former Light Horsemen did eventually write their memoirs (Ian Idriss is probably the best of the lot) and the stories of their remarkable exploits started to emerge during the 1920's and 30's, but there was never an influential official historian attached to the Australian Light Horse in the Middle East to promote their story. In France and Belgium, the redoubtable Australian Official War Historian CEW Bean was an ever-present sight in the trenches, chronicling and eulogising the exploits of the ANZAC's. There was no equivalent to Bean in Palestine in 1917-18, so the actions of the Light Horse were never as closely scrutinised or reported as those of their comrades in France and Belgium.

For many years my wife and I have been members of the Australian Heritage Horse Association (WA), which forms part of the Australian Light Horse Re-enactment Group. My wife is mad about horses and has a passion for seeing the restoration of the uniquely Australian breed, the Australian Waler Horse, which was the mount of the Australian Light Horse, the Indian Cavalry and even King George V. Few if any of these magnificent beasts were allowed to return to Australia after the war, many were given away and others were shot by their riders rather than be put to work by the local Arabs. The Waler as a breed was preserved among the wild horses that had been released and allow to run free over the vast grass plains and deserts of central Australia. Every year the AHHAWA conducts a round up to take some of the healthier pure breed Walers out of the wild and use them as breeding stock. The bloodlines are now sustainable and the breed is now flourishing a stock horse on farms around the country.

This is a long-winded way of agreeing with you Mark. The charge of the Australian Light Horse at Beersheba may never be as well known as the Charge of the Light Brigade at Balaclava, but it is remembered by a few of us. Importantly, the bloodline of the horses that led that charge has been restored and preserved.

10552468_10152519221779194_3429785251353058481_n.jpg
 
I should also point out that strictly speaking, the Australian Light Horse were not cavalry troops but were Mounted Infantry.

This isn't simply semantics. Cavalry troops typically were armed with swords and lances and were intended to fight on horseback.

Mounted Infantry typically fought with rifles and bayonets and dismount when engaging with the enemy and fight on foot. The fact that the Light Horse chose to charge Beersheba and fight on horseback was considered to be one of the critical tactical factors that threw the Turkish defenders and their German advisors off balance and gained the element of surprise for the attackers. It may have also been critical in the low casualty rate, as the Turkish guns were sighted to engage the attacking forces at 1200 metres, where they were expected to dismount. By the time they realised that the horses weren't stopping and the attack was at a full gallop, the Light Horse were "under the guns" and were bearing down on the defensive trenches surrounding the town itself.

I wouldn't have wanted to be one of those Turkish soldiers in the trenches. 800 horses galloping straight towards you would make the earth shake and make your bowels turn to water. The sight of 800 mad Aussies waving their bayonets and screaming at the top of their lungs as they bear down on you would also have contributed to the fear and shock of the attack.
 
Thanks Tony, a very interesting read!(y) .. However, I now have another shoulder patch to contend with!!:LOL: So far I have. Red/White. Blue/White. Blue/Turquoise.. and now Yellow and Black!! :arghh:

I have to admit, I was really interested with the 'Horse Lineage'. and why they had to be left behind! .. Poor buggers, both horse and man!:(

Mark
 
Mark,

Yellow and Black are the colours of the 10th Light Horse Regiment, which comes from my home state of Western Australia. The unit was virtually wiped out in the infamous bayonet charge at The Nek on Gallipoli, which was made famous in the Peter Weir movie "Gallipoli" starring Mel Gibson.

The unit was reformed after Gallipoli and served throughout the Middle East campaign. Being a Western Australian, the 10th is my local unit so our re-enactment troop proudly wear the 10th's colours.

The 10th ALH had the honour of being the first Allied troops to enter Damascus after it was abandoned by the Turks. The unit history and personal diaries of the men record with playful delight the uncouth and colourful insults and cat-calls the troopers from the 10th gave to Lawrence of Arabia and his Hejaz "Army" when they arrived on the outskirts of Damascus, two days after the Australians had arrived, and claimed to "liberate" the city from the Turks without firing a shot.

The red/ white diamond patch belongs to the 13th Light Horse Regiment, which was sent to France to form divisional cavalry squadrons to support the 2nd , 4th & 5th Divisions of the 1st ANZAC Corps. They were issued with cavalry swords and performed their duties as cavalry troops rather than as Mounted Infantry like their brothers in the Middle East.

To save you some time, I've attached a link to the best website for researching Light Horse uniforms and history during WW1, which shows all the unit colour patches.

http://www.lighthorse.org.au/resour...quip-and-conduct-4.-regimental-colour-patches
 
Hi Ron,

Rather than repeat all this, I've cut and paste a bit of history of the Waler breed from the Waler Horse Association website. The quote at the end speaks volumes for the esteem and affection the Waler was held in by the men of the Light Horse.

"Successive Governors encouraged the breeding of horses to meet the needs of transport and communications in the developing colony. Soon, owners of large properties were to breed these colonial horses by the thousands not only for the domestic needs but for what became a lucrative export trade in remounts, initially to the British Army in India. Strict standards of conformation and temperament were monitored by breeders for the fastidious remount horse agents.

The practice of cross-breeding the small number of breeds available in Australia at the time resulted in a versatile work horse with good weight carrying capabilities, speed, endurance and the ability to thrive on the native pastures.

These colonial bred horses became known as the “Waler”, a term coined by the British in India given to those horses that were bred in the colony of New South Wales.

TA Coghlan, who became the government statistician in 1886, wrote:-
The colony is specially adapted for the breeding of saddle and light harness horses and it is doubtful where these particular breeds of Australian horses are anywhere surpassed. The bush horse is hardy and swift and capable of making very long and rapid journeys when fed only on the ordinary herbage of the country: and in times of drought, when grass and water have become scanty, these animals often perform astonishing feats of endurance” (Wealth and Progress of NSW 1884, p348).

Walers were used overseas as remounts for the cavalry, as artillery horses, and as carriage and sport horses for both the British Army and the Raj in India. By 1867, the Waler was regarded by the British as amongst the finest cavalry horse in the world. Horses were exported from the colony as early as 1816 through private sales and the flourishing remount trade which ran from the 1830s till the 1960s.

Walers were supplied to the Australian army for the Boer War, where mounted on their strong robust Walers, the Australians established an enviable reputation for their horses and their horsemanship. Later in WWI, the Waler became legendary with the Australian Light Horse for their feats of endurance and courage in the desert campaigns and later in France.

During WWI, about 160,000 horses were sent overseas. The Light Horse proved themselves with feats of endurance and bravery in the sands of the Middle East. One of the most courageous and internationally recognised charges was that of the 4th and 12th Regiments at Beersheba on 31 October 1917, where after a full night’s march and a day’s fighting with no water, they galloped across a burning plain at the entrenched and heavily armed Turks, winning the day and the water wells of Beersheba. A monument was erected in Sydney by returned soldiers who due to quarantine and army economies had to leave their mounts behind. It has the inscription “by members of the Desert Mounted Corps and friends, to the gallant horses who carried them over the Sinai Desert into Palestine, 1915-19.They suffered wounds, thirst, hunger and weariness almost beyond endurance, but they never failed. They did not come home.”
 
Thanks Tony, I will run with the 4th Regiment, as a shoulder patch!(y). There is a lot more to this 'Middle East', arena that is glossed over, or kicked to the side lines of history.

And I find it hard to believe, that any of the 'Aussies', would feel compelled enough to heckle a poor old Englishman, 'Lawrence'. ... :LOL::ROFLMAO:

Regards,

Mark
 
Only thing I would take issue with there Tony is " Few if any of these magnificent beasts were allowed to return to Australia after the war, many were given away and others were shot by their riders rather than be put to work by the local Arabs." That is now believed to be a myth http://www.awm.gov.au/wartime/44/page54_bou/ an understandable one but a myth none the less, similar ones exist here about the horses in France for the same reasons
Steve
 
Although mounted infantry, weren't some Light Horse units issued with sabres later on in the War?

Mike
 
Many thanks for a most interesting post, Tony.....I knew a bit of the Light Horse at Beersheba, but not the origin of the horse breed. Great to see them being bred back into 'full blood' again. "King and Country" painted figures did the charge with several figures a couple of years ago, I believe, so they are rightfully commemorated in one aspect of our hobby. It's not a bad sequence in the film "The Lighthorsemen", either.

Cheers, Alan
 
Hi Steve,

Further to your comment and the link you added, my point was that most of the Waler's did not return home from the war. I am aware of the myth-making that lies at the heart of the accounts of Light horsemen shooting their mounts, rather than handing them over to the Arabs. It makes for good emotive propaganda and fits neatly with the romanticism of the legend, but I also doubt it happened on a wide scale.

The rebuilding of the bloodlines of the Walers was difficult because the Government did not allow more than a handful of pure bred Walers back to Australia from the war for fear of disease and our very strict quarantine laws. The domestic stocks had been reduced significantly by the demands of the war and the horses that were not sent abroad were either too old or not good enough quality to breed. It has taken almost 100 years for the bloodlines of the Waler breed to be restored, which gives you some indication of the extent to which the horse population of Australia was devastated by our involvement in WW1. In that time, horses have been largely replaced by trucks and cars in the agricultural and transport industries, and are now more popular as pets than as working animals. The horses that survive today have no idea of the sacrifices and hardships made by their ancestors, but the spirit of those proud war horses literally runs through the veins of today's Walers.
 
A similar, parallel story to our very own Suffolk Punch breed, now on the endangered list of rare breeds. Only 400 of this once ubiquitous breed left, rarer than the panda.
There is now a concerted effort being made to place all suitable mares in foal, so we may see them outside of country shows in the future.
The Suffolk Punch was extensively used on the Western Front as a draught animal, both for the Artillery and general haulage. Always of a chestnut colour, I've not come across any pictures of greys or blacks, and they suffered immense casualties in their war duties.
Cheers,
Alan
 
Alan, they do look like a good strong 'Draught Horse'. I hope they do return in numbers!(y)

It would seem that even after 100yrs, there is still a price to pay for mans folly!

IMGP1486.jpg

Mark
 
Agreed Tony and as Alan states it has a parallel here, my own purely personal view is the wars massive industrialisation effectivly ended the horses reign as much if not more but as said its an IMO only. Either way its to be hoped both breeds make it through in the future
Steve
 
Back
Top