December 19, 1939

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Martin Antonenko

A Fixture
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
9,001
A weapon crucial to war...



In the Moscow Kremlin, on December 19, 1939, the members of the USSR Defense Committee discuss draft resolution number 445.

After a short discussion, the following decision is made:

"The following is to be transferred to the Red Workers' and Peasants' Army (RKKA):

The tank T 32 with diesel engine B2, number 183 with the following changes:
a) increasing the thickness of the main armor plates up to 45 mm;
b) improvement of protection of tanks;
c) F32 76 mm cannon coupled with a 7.62 mm machine gun;
d) Another 7.62 machine gun.

The tank is assigned the designation "Tank 34" (T 34)."

It is the birth of what is probably the best tank of all time - the famous T 34!

The tank was invented in a development office by 40 graduates of the Military Academy of Mechanization and Motorization of the Workers' and Peasants' Red Army (RKKA) in Kharkov under the direction of engineer Michael Ilyich Koshkin...:



Before the decision was made, various prototypes had been extensively tested at the Kubinka test site...:



The T 34 was ultimately based on a development by US designer John Walter Christie from 1928.

In 1928 Christie succeeded in building a revolutionary tank chassis, the model M1928. The tracks could be removed so that the vehicle could also drive on wheels. What was new about it was that each wheel was individually sprung.

This made the vehicle faster and more manoeuvrable off-road, but it had weak armor. Only on the front was it more protected with sloped armor. The US Army bought some vehicles for testing.



While the design was impressive when the M1928 was demonstrated at Fort Myers, Virginia, the US Army wanted heavily armored tanks to support front-line infantry rather than fast, agile vehicles capable of penetrating enemy rears.

Therefore, Christie's tanks were passed on to the cavalry. The Cavalry wanted to further develop the M1928 as an armed car. Again there was disagreement between the Army Authority and Christie over the concept.

Eventually, the Secretary of Defense refused to mass-produce the Christie tank because it was too expensive. Christie was now trying to sell his invention to the highest bidder, no matter who.

At that time, the Soviet Union had no diplomatic relations with the USA and was not allowed to buy weapons there. Soviet agents got their hands on the plans for the M1928 anyway.

In 1930, Christie's company agreed to supply the Soviets with two (further developed by him) M1931 tanks. The two tanks were shipped to the Soviet Union disguised as tractors.

From this, the technicians of the Soviet Union first developed the BT tank series, here a BT 5...



... and finally the T 34....:



The tank was almost indestructible, was characterized by high speed, very good off-road mobility, easy handling, robust and simple construction and inexpensive production processes.



To demonstrate the tank's capabilities and reliability, Koshkin drove 1939 - in the winter! - a prototype itself on the road from the manufacturer's plant in Kharkov (today Charkiv, free Ukraine) to Moscow - the tank mastered the 750-kilometer route without any problems!



However, Koshkin himself paid a high price for the journey: the tank prototype did not yet have a heater installed and Koshkin was not a trained tank driver and therefore drove the entire route with the driver's hatch open.

Due to the ice-cold draft he contracted pneumonia, from which he died on September 26, 1940 in Kharkov...:





The troops were enthusiastic about the model because the bullet-resistant innovative shape and good armor protected the tankers - in contrast to the BT tanks, which were considered rolling pyres due to their thin armor and high flammability. (There were several bitter soldiers' songs in the Red Army about the fire sensitivity of the BT tanks.)

When the Soviets moved their factories behind the Urals in front of the approaching Germans (and thus out of reach of the Luftwaffe), some of the production machines were set up in the open, supply connections were made and the T 34s were assembled in the open air, while all around the Workers pulling up factory walls...

When Engineer Koshkin died, the first pre-series T 34s were already available and from 1941 the tank was produced in large quantities: between 1941 and 1945 more than 50,000 examples were built, in total - production ended in 1958 - there were about 80,000. Here is a model from the production year 1943...:



There were countless variants of the T 34 that were constantly being improved. The variant most frequently built during the war was the T34/76, the 76 mm cannon became longer and longer over time in order to reduce the launch speed (= “Vau Null”) and with it Increase the range and penetration of the projectiles...:

The tank was last built - from April 1945 - as the T 34/85 with an enlarged turret and more powerful armament (85 mm gun)...:



It is certainly no exaggeration to call the T 34 a decisive weapon of World War II, as the tank came as a nasty surprise to the German attackers. In 1941 and 1942 it was clearly superior to all German tanks.

Disadvantages were - initially - the lack of a radio system (it existed in 1942) and the lack of a fifth crew member, the gunner. The T34/85 then also had the “5. Man”, which is why the tower was also considerably larger.

In 1941, despite having a highly maneuverable tank for use in large formations, the Soviets made the mistake of using the tanks individually - as rolling bunkers, so to speak - for infantry support. But the Red Army quickly learned...

The sheer number, significantly improved tactical leadership and use in large formations to form priorities more than made up for the advantage of the better armed new German tanks "Tiger" and "Panther" from the end of 1942.



The T 34 has a long life - until today!

During the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s, T-34/85s were used by both Serbian and Croatian troops. Here is a T34/85 of the Serbian armed forces, with makeshift additional armor made of rubber mats (against limpet mines!), photographed in February 1996. In front of it you can just see the rear of another T34/85...:



The following one was photographed three years ago in action in Syria...:

main-qimg-41ca9e6bcdcb546e011ecb60fd270c7b-lq
 
Ask most to name tanks in WW2 and the T34 along with the Tiger will definitely be mentioned

Incredible they were still being used in Syria ...sure there might be more even now in use

Cheers

Nap
 
Ah, one of my favourite discussions..:sneaky:;).

The argument of which was "the best" tank of WWII is as simple as it is complex.
It really boils down to three tanks in general, the T-34, the Sherman, and the Pz.Kpfw. IV.
It is no coincidence that there is one crucial design per side of the conflict, and that the most important or decisive designs were designed prior to the war, and served throughout the conflict, and beyond.
The Sherman and T-34 had the benefit large production facilities, and therefore the advantag of numerical superiority.

The Pz.Kpfw IV was until late 1943/early 1944 arguably the beter tank, especially once it was upgraded with the 75mm L48 gun. The basic chassis was easy to convert to tank destroyers, self propelled Artillery and anti aircraft artillery. Its largest drawback was the vertical armour plating, which didnt deflect incoming rounds very well.

The Sherman had production numbers on its side, but suffered from design flaws, and an inability to significantly increase its armament or armour thickness/protection.

The T-34 also had numbers as its greatest advantage. It also benefitted from the sloped armour, and the much more reliable diesel engine. The 76mm gun was matched with the German 75mm gun, and the later L42 and L48 out ranged the T-34, allowing the Germans to engage the Russians from a greater distance. German crews were arguably beter trained and skilled in gunnery than Russians, mainly because of the Russian doctrine of "just overwhelm the enemy with overwhelming numbers".

In the end, it was not the technical superiority of the Allied armoured vehicles that won the war, it was the fact that they could replace the tanks that they lost, at a greater rate than the Germans could replace theirs.
 
There a still some T 34 in service at Yemen conflict in use of the "Huthi Rebels" and some of them belong to the Angola armed forces...

Cheers.

PS. For me in the best Tank of WW2 ist the T 34. Some German Models we're better and more modern of course, but tecnically too complicated.

Remember more 'Tiger' tanks broke down about tecnical problems as of Allied weapons.

The IV was a good tank, no doubt, but a construction of the early 30's.

A German WW2 Tank today under conditions like at Yemen or Angola would definitively Not able to drive or to fight.

Seen from all aspects the T34 was the best of all.
 
Back
Top