New Andrea Miniatures

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Pedro Molina

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
413
Location
Madrid
PC-11
BUCCANEER PORTOBELLO,1668
Material: white metal (5 piezas)
Scale: 54mm 1/32
sculpture: Miniatures Andrea
Box Art: Julio Cabos

72986_519687108071748_1001264819_n.jpg

424525_519687034738422_1956642917_n.jpg

45544_519687038071755_1035094036_n.jpg

602723_519687041405088_1224516188_n.jpg

312364_519687081405084_1242788303_n.jpg
 
I think I like the look of this :cautious: but would want to see it before I buy.
Box art does absolutely nothing for it, looks like 'photoshopped type' watercolour programme has been used to alter a photo of figure.
 
Sculpt seems to be consistent with their existing line of pirates, which seems to be well represented both at the shows I attend, and at the ones for which we are provided images.
And not to be a contrarian, but I don't have any issues with the painted version shown here. I'm guessing this was painted under a deadline, but that in no way detracts from the presentation. I like the attempt at showing both the pants and coat in a well-used condition, and if there are glaring technical issues, as some seem to suggest, frankly, I'm not seeing them.
Have we reached the point where we expect each box art example to be the best possible rendition of a new figure?
I would guess that a manufacturer, especially of Andrea's scope and experience, would wish to strike a balance with its box art that encourages painters to buy and try, without placing the bar so high as to dissuade possible purchasers with a message that says "you can never paint this as well as the box-art artist".
I don't recall these comments about the other pieces in this line. Is this one really so inferior to its predecessors?
Anyway, I like the piece, and I predict that the "pirate fans" amongst us will purchase and paint many of these in the coming months.
 
Sculpt seems to be consistent with their existing line of pirates, which seems to be well represented both at the shows I attend, and at the ones for which we are provided images.
And not to be a contrarian, but I don't have any issues with the painted version shown here. I'm guessing this was painted under a deadline, but that in no way detracts from the presentation. I like the attempt at showing both the pants and coat in a well-used condition, and if there are glaring technical issues, as some seem to suggest, frankly, I'm not seeing them.
Have we reached the point where we expect each box art example to be the best possible rendition of a new figure?
I would guess that a manufacturer, especially of Andrea's scope and experience, would wish to strike a balance with its box art that encourages painters to buy and try, without placing the bar so high as to dissuade possible purchasers with a message that says "you can never paint this as well as the box-art artist".
I don't recall these comments about the other pieces in this line. Is this one really so inferior to its predecessors?
Anyway, I like the piece, and I predict that the "pirate fans" amongst us will purchase and paint many of these in the coming months.

I think you have our comments taken wrongly. The sculpt is excellent like all of their other pieces but the painting is not. This is painted by their studio artist and overly talented Mr. Julio Cabos whom I have met and admire him not only for his talent but his overall awesomeness at being a human being. I'll get to meet him again this March at the Lone star show and ask him about this painting. You know I am the first to defend something that is figure related that is being kicked in the throat wrongly. This is being kicked in the throat for the right reason, Mr. Cabos can paint better than this, maybe we are spoiled by his perfect paint?
 
Great figure but unusal quality of paint from Mr. Cabos.

I agree, it's a great 54mm figure and an excellent addition to their Pirate collection, but I had to go back and look several times at this one because this box art work is certainly not in Julio Cabos' usual distinctive and pulchritudinous style.
But that's simply an observation apart from the obvious merits of the sculpted piece.
 
Mike, what's "wrong" with the painted figure? I can be convinced that the photos might be a bit dodgy (is the base just floating in the air?), but the painting? I need some help here, please! :)
The sunburned face is well done, in my opinion.
The calves are a bit funky, maybe, but is that the painting, or some overzealous photo-shop work?
I like the dirt-stained coat, and the ragged trousers.
Blending seems to be competent throughout, and there are no obvious coloring-outside-the-lines areas that I can see.
There is, at the top of the gun between barrel and rammer in a couple of the images, some white space where the background was not colored in (again, photo-shop issues?), but that can't be the fault of the painter, can it?
I think we need an image of the painted figure, as it sits on the table, to properly assess the "quality" of this figure.
Or maybe I just having a rough evening - it is damn cold here in New England tonight!!
 
Don, it's not a huge expectation placed on box art, it's an expectation placed on painter. Put "Cabos" into PF search and notice how different box art is in other works. There is nothing wrong, box art is a box art, but as other pieces say " buy me!", this has a " that will do" feel in comparison. You are right though, expectations are rising in line with large quantities of top quality works we are bombarded with monthly.
 
Back
Top