The Battle of Langside : 13th May 1568

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

harrytheheid

A Fixture
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
939
Location
Sitting in mah hoose in NE Asia
BACKGROUND
Only six days old when her father, James V, died on 14 December 1542, Mary Queen of Scots is one of the most fascinating individuals in the history of the British Isles.

For her safety she was sent to France where in 1558 she married the Dauphin, Francis. He succeeded to the throne the following year but their brief reign as King and Queen of France ended when Francis died in 1560.
A widow at eighteen, Mary Stuart decided to return to Scotland. Arriving in Edinburgh on 19 August 1561, Mary was immediately embroiled in tangled politics and religious divisions. The country was now (certainly in the Lowlands) mainly Protestant - and she was a Roman Catholic; an unfortunate combination that would be a significant factor in the turmoil of her reign.

Pressured to choose a husband, she wed Lord Henry Darnley, on 29 July 1565.
The marriage was calamitous.
Denied the crown matrimonial, Darnley embarked on a life of debauchery and participated in the savage murder of Mary’s Italian secretary, David Rizzio, during which a pistol was discharged next to the heavily pregnant Queen. Presumably in the hope she would miscarry the child.
Despite the subsequent birth of their son James, relations between Mary and Darnley were now irreconcilable. Amid increasing tensions and no doubt, diseased, he took up residence in his townhouse at Kirk O’Field on the outskirts of Edinburgh.
On the night of 9 February 1567 a tremendous explosion was heard across the city and Darnley’s strangled body was found in the grounds of the blazing building. Whether he was murdered before or after the blast remains a mystery.

Given the circumstances, it’s hardly surprising that fingers of suspicion were pointed at the Queen. But what began as whispers escalated to full-scale public outrage only five weeks later when Mary Stuart lit the fuse to her very own explosion and married James Hepburn, the Earl of Bothwell, who had set aside his lawful wife, Lady Jean Gordon; but even more significantly, he was the conspirator widely believed to have planned and carried out Darnley’s murder!

This utterly bizarre situation was the final excuse for widespread Protestant revolt. Led by the the Queen's illegitimate half-brother, James Stewart the Earl of Moray, the rebels faced off against Bothwell’s troops at Carbury Hill a few miles east of Edinburgh on 15 June 1567, but as battles go it turned to high farce as the hastily-raised and unenthusiastic Royalist army quietly melted away throughout the long hot summer’s day.
The ill-fated Bothwell took to his heels and eventually washed up in Scandinavia.
Meanwhile, the Queen of Scots was taken into custody and held at the island castle of Lochleven where she was persuaded to abdicate in favor of her infant son who was crowned James VI, while Moray was appointed as Regent to rule Scotland on behalf of the child.

On the night of 2 May 1568 Mary escaped from her prison on Lochleven and in a last daring adventure, began raising an army from among her remaining supporters.
The decisive battle took place on 13 May 1568 at the village of Langside, near Glasgow. The Queen’s army was destroyed in less than an hour. With all hope of overthrowing Regent Moray now gone she was escorted from the battlefield by the Lords Claude Hamilton and Maxwell Herries, who counselled her to return to France.


DIORAMA

This small diorama represents the closing stages of the battle at Langside.
Royalist forces have been pushed out of the narrow village streets and back to a small river called The White Cart. With the remnants of Mary’s army on the point of a full-scale route, the Queen is told that all is lost.
Mary Stuart, who was still only twenty-six, ignored the advice of her Lords to go into exile in France, (which was never a realistic option anyway). Along with a small group of adherents she slipped across the Solway Firth and into England on 16 May 1568.
The Queen of Scots was never to see Scotland or her son James again.

The bridge is a resin kit from “Reality in Scale”.
01.JPG


I couldn’t find a suitable figure to represent the Scottish Queen, so I made my own with bits and pieces from my spares box....
02. .JPG


....and a lot of filler.
The horse was part of a Napoleonic set I bought years ago during a business trip to Budapest.
03. .JPG


Once she was finished, the diorama kind of just fell into place. Some farm animals were included to indicate widespread looting by the Royalist Army.
04. .JPG


05. .JPG


06. .JPG


07. .JPG


08. .JPG


09. .JPG


10. .JPG


11. .JPG


12. .JPG



EPILOGUE

Mary had fled into England intending to petition her cousin Queen Elizabeth I for money to raise a new army; financial aid that unknown to the Scottish Queen, Elizabeth had no intention of granting.
With Elizabeth seen by many of her Catholic subjects as illegitimate – thus Mary being the true heir to the English throne – she was taken into “protective confinement” and would endure increasingly arduous imprisonment for the rest of her days.
Nineteen years later, Mary Stuart was put on trial for complicity in the Babington plot; a bungled affair that might well have been a clever “sting operation” planned by Sir Francis Walsingham – Elizabeth’s spymaster. The verdict was never in any doubt and she was executed at Fotheringhay Castle, Northamptonshire, on 8 February 1587.

James Stewart, the Earl of Moray, was shot dead in 1570 by a member of the Hamilton family. It was the first recorded assassination of a Head of State by use of a firearm. He was succeeded by a string of fairly ineffectual Regents, who pretty much without exception also came to a sticky end.

Due to a previous affair with the Norwegian noblewoman, Anna Throndsen, whom he had deserted when she was carrying his child; James Hepburn, the Earl of Bothwell, was imprisoned in Denmark by the lady’s offended family and kept in a dungeon under unspeakable conditions for ten years. He was still in chains, and most probably completely insane, by the time he died in 1578.

Elizabeth died in 1603 and was succeeded by Mary Stuart’s son, James VI of Scots, and now James I, Monarch of the United Kingdom of Great Britain. In 1612 he had his mother’s remains exhumed and re-interred in Westminster Abbey. Her final resting place lies at the opposite end of the aisle to Elizabeth’s tomb.


IN MY END IS MY BEGINNING
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
FOLLOW UP

This one, set three days after the disaster at Langside, depicts the now fugitive Mary Stuart and her principal lady-in-waiting, Lady Janet Fleming, preparing to make the fateful crossing from Scotland into England; while her remaining companions argue with that dodgy Cumbrian whisky smuggler about how much loot he's demanding for the 16th Century taxi service – and whether he’ll do a deal for two separate trips across the border, seeing as his boat is fairly full and low in the water as it is.
Again, suitable 54mm kit figures and slightly converted standard figures were used. The rowboat is a resin kit from Verlinden Productions. Additional accessories came from my spares box. The horse is a conversion from a very old Figarti Miniatures release and the lady’s side-saddle was scratch built. Not being familiar with lady's side-saddles I had assumed they had two stirrups on one side, but a pal of mine who runs his own stud put me straight on that one.
13. .JPG


14.JPG


15. .JPG


16. .JPG
 
Amazon Sadler see evolution here ( in French
http://eroschevauxpassion.over-blog.com/article-26511947.html
Lot of changes through the ages

Love your diodrama

Thank you for the helpful link Mirofsoft.

It's taken a while to find the reference folder where I filed these images, but this modern example was what provided some insight into how side-saddles work.
2018-06-20 02.48.22.jpg


And this near-contemporary early-16th century side-saddle gave me the basic shape for the scratch-built effort in the second diorama.
2018-06-19 18.49.14.jpg


Of course, my figure representing Mary Queen of Scots in the first diorama was based on this photo of Vanessa Redgrave from the set of the early-1970's movie, which is a brilliant romp with Glenda Jackson as Elizabeth I munching the scenery every shot she's in.

MQoS_2.jpg


And here's some random WIP photos.
02.JPG


02-Jul-2018_MQoS_2.JPG


10. Vignette - Started Over Again.JPG


23-Jun-2018_MQoS_1.JPG


23-Jun-2018_MQoS_11.JPG


25-Jun-2018_MQoS_4.JPG


28-Jun-2018_MQoS_4.JPG
 
Wow! Stunning dioramas, Harry! So much detail! And the historical references are simply amazing!
Not to mention the fact that all this is done in such a small scale (I can hardly do 120mm scale, so 54mm is completely out of my reach) !
You are a real inspiration in the art of making dioramas! Sincere congratulations!

Cheers!

Dolf
 
Hi H

Excellent thread , great background details and modelling on all the figures , nicely painted as well

Are those flags freehand ?

Nce groundwork on all as well

Thanks for sharing

Happy benchtime

Nap

Why not put something into FOTM as well ..plenty of time for the July/August comp
 
Wow! Stunning dioramas, Harry! So much detail! And the historical references are simply amazing!
Not to mention the fact that all this is done in such a small scale (I can hardly do 120mm scale, so 54mm is completely out of my reach) !
You are a real inspiration in the art of making dioramas! Sincere congratulations!

Cheers!

Dolf

Hi H

Excellent thread , great background details and modelling on all the figures , nicely painted as well

Are those flags freehand ?

Nce groundwork on all as well

Thanks for sharing

Happy benchtime

Nap

Why not put something into FOTM as well ..plenty of time for the July/August comp

Guys, just to clarify:-
The figures are a mix of 54mm white metal kits painted by myself, and pre-painted toy soldiers - almost all of which have been converted to some extent; some more, some less.
I don't have enough brass neck to put any of my efforts into FOTM. I'm primarily a vignette and small diorama builder and this is reflected in the very average quality of my figure painting, at which I'm no more than basically competent.

The dioramas are built onto miniature display tables and the groundwork is formed from celluclay painted with tube acrylics with various lengths and shades of static grass added.
Additional flowers and foliage are mainly from Silfor or Reality in Scale. The trees are from a model railways vendor. The animals were contributed by our 4-year old Grandson, although I'm not too sure if he's aware of that.
The biggest boo-boo is that I forgot to include the tracks left by everyday traffic in the groundwork either end of the bridge - oops!

The historical background is a highly condensed version of an article I wrote for a USA-based hobby magazine. Much of the details were drawn from both John Guy's and Lady Antonia Fraser's biographies of Mary Stuart.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mary-Queen...0050C87NK/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

If Mary Stuart historical fiction is your thing - and it's certainly mine when I'm in the mood for it - then there's a vast quantity of it out there. Some of it is surprisingly good if you can get past the more obvious bodice-rippers, which rules out the likes of Ms Gregory, or yon Margaret George wifie.
Nigel Tranter's "Warden of the Queen's March" isn't bad, although there's a bit too much "this happened, and then something else happened" with no great depth as to the reasons why.
https://www.amazon.com/Warden-Queen...coding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=SAVHMHNYZ1E8A217VAVC

Jean Plaidy's two-volume set is possibly the most historically accurate, and nowhere near as cloyingly saccharine as you might think at first glance, (once you get past the first few chapters).
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Royal-Road...004E10RL8/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8

Here's a few more WIP photos.
1.JPG


3.JPG


_DSC0023.JPG


26-Jun-2018_MQoS_7.JPG


04-Jul-2018_MQoS_2.JPG


11.JPG


12=Jul.JPG


_DSC0009.JPG


_DSC0003.JPG


16-Jul-2018_a.JPG
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Terrific work, very interesting read.. The only other history Ive heard was watching " Horrible Histories " on Tv (y)

Mary Stuart’s claim to the English throne stems from her Grandmother, Margaret Tudor, older sister of England’s Henry VIII and wife of James IV, King of Scots.

Not to turn this into a movie review, but depictions of her life-story on film while generally following the main events are, as you’d expect, full of plot holes and historical inaccuracies.
The main ones I’m aware of are;

mqos5.jpg

John Ford’s “Mary of Scotland” with Katherine Hepburn as the ill-fated Scottish Queen.
Best watched just for the fun of it. Florence Eldrige's cringe-inducing Elizabeth I is only surpassed by Douglas Walton’s splendidly OTT performance as Lord Darnley, which is pure comedy gold.
Hollywood's idea of what your average 16th Century North British Skirt-Wearing Hairy Barbarian Savage looked and sounded like is particularly funny.
Verdict 6/10

mqos4.jpg

A 2-part mini-series from 2004 called “Gunpowder, Treason and Plot”.
Granted it’s not everyone’s cup of Earl Gray and Part 2 is a farcical James I vs Guy Fawkes piece of nonsense, but Part 1 is far better and deals with Mary Stuart’s personal reign in Scotland.
French actress Clémence Poésy, who was 20-years old when it was filmed, turns in a quite creditable performance as Mary.
Kevin McKidd is a very believable James Hepburn Earl of Bothwell.
Mary’s illegitimate half-brother, James Stewart Earl of Moray, is played in a workmanlike manner by Steven Duffy.
Curiously, Scottish actress Catherine McCormack (Braveheart) was cast as Elizabeth I.
Verdict 6/10

mqos1.jpg

Although it has its moments, the “Mary Queen of Scots” movie from 2013 is best avoided unless the viewer actually enjoys watching paint dry.
Verdict 3/10

mqos2.jpg

Similarly, the more recent “Mary Queen of Scots” effort from 2018 was deservedly trashed as transparent 3rd wave feminist propaganda/nonsense.
Verdict 0/10

mqos3.jpg

Everything’s subjective of course, but for me 1971’s “Mary Queen of Scots” is still the best of the lot despite its glaring inaccuracies and amazing overacting from both Vanessa Redgrave and especially the pre “Elizabeth R” Glenda Jackson – who plays it like some thigh slapping Eastenders Pub Landlady, while she's twirling her mustache and auditioning for the part of "The Villain" in the latest Shakespearean Christmas Pantomime.

The action opens over in France where, without a care in the world, young Mary is skipping through the sunny fields with her beloved husband, the Dauphin.
They've just began taking a boat trip down some picturesque river when – "Aaaargh! Mon Dieu and Sacred Blue! My head hurts!" – and the Dauphin collapses.
These "fevers of the brain" were the result of an ear infection – an ear infection that ended up killing him (?)
So Mary heads home to the romantic mist-covered mountains and her toxic tartan-clad Lords in Edinburgh.

Meanwhile, Elizabeth is also taking a boat trip. She’s on the Thames rolling around in the royal barge with Robert Dudley. The Virgin Queen?……Hmmm.
Dudley's wife then rather conveniently dies in a mysterious fall down the stairs. But instead of now being free to marry Elizabeth, she tries to marry him off to the widowed Mary.
Of course, Mary’s much too smart to fall for that one and thumbs her nose at the English Queen by marrying dimwitted hunk Lord Darnley, a far-out cousin of Mary's and an English subject.
Through a haze of alcohol fumes, Darnley then becomes convinced that she’s having an affair with her midget Italian secretary and sometime music teacher David Rizzio, who may also be a papal spy.
So, for reasons unknown, Darnley decides to have an equally unlikely romance with Rizzio as well.

When Dudley returns from failing to woo Mary, Elizabeth asks him to describe her.
Dudley waxes lyrical, so she pulls on her boxing gloves and gives him a bloody good hiding.
"But, but, I only went to Scotland at your command! I love only you!" he bleats.
Unimpressed, she delivers a vicious punch straight to the codpiece.
This seems to calm her down.
"I am no longer angry," she tells him sweetly, (at this point the poor guy is bent double and wheezing).
"Is she really as beautiful as they say?"
"Well, she is quite beautiful," the jackass stupidly replies.
This earns him a right hook to the jaw.

Cut to Scotland where a band of, still toxic and tartan-clad rebel Lords, plus Darnley, storm the palace gates, stab Rizzio and drag him away - then stab him 55 more times just to be sure.
As previously discussed, Darnley is then done to death - in the night - at his house, which is destroyed by a massive gunpowder blast.
Back at the English court, Trevor Howard as Sir William Cecil shakes his head, stares at the floor, and ponders the fact that you simply couldn’t make this shit up.

As well as Trevor Howard, also worthy of note in the acting chops are;
Nigel Davenport, who plays Bothwell as an almost sympathetic character.
Patrick McGoohan, who shines as the duplicitous James Stewart.
Robert James as John Knox - too bad he doesn't feature more in the movie.
Ian Holm as Rizzio.
Timothy Dalton as Darnley.
Daniel Massey as Dudley.

The film-makers do add twists and turns of their own – with a ludicrous suggestion that the permanently blootered (i.e. intoxicated) Darnley had set up the explosion at Kirk o'Field to kill Mary.
And then they dream up not just one, but two fictional meetings between Vanessa and Glenda. Why bother? Anyone with even a basic grasp of the events knows the distant cousins never met?
Evidently there's far too much plot here; as indeed there was in 16th century Scotland.

Arguably, the most historically accurate moment is the potentially moving execution scene, complete with a sexy wasp-waisted version of the red chemise that the real Mary wore under her black gown – red being the color of catholic martyrdom.
Personally speaking, I'm glad they didn't show how much the actual beheading was botched.
Verdict 10/10

A kickass movie. Watch it……It’s brilliant..!!
:)
 
All very well done and very interesting to look at along with the stories. Obviously a labor of love, talent and patience. Now.... I want to see another one and I want it "NOW"...…...

Wayne:)

Well, I'm up to my eyes with figures for the late-Victorian Flashman fantasy I started on some weeks ago.
But if you can wait a few days, then I'll get my finger out and finally complete this incident from the Wars of the Three Kingdoms circa 1646.
:)
14. Covenanter Flag Bearer_a.JPG


Phoenix 2.JPG
 
Can't believe I missed this mate, fabulous (y)
I've lived in the area for over 55 years and have always had a sense of the history as I played and now walk about the area. Obviously everything has changed but the street structure in much of the area, known as Battlefield, still follows the original village layout. The battle is very well documented but as is often the case there are more than a few versions of the details of the day.
One is that Mary watched the defeat of her army from a hill a couple of miles to the south east of the battlefield. This is now known as Court Knowe and would certainly have provided a good vantage point. The problem is that Cathcart Castle was less than 100 yards away and was held by a supporter of the Regent. However if she did watch from the higher ground around here her troops might well have fled in that general direction, this could mean that the bridge in the scene could possibly have been Cathcart's Snuff Mill Bridge. This was built in the 1700's but a date stone shows a date in the mid 1600's although current opinion believes that this refers to a rebuild or repair to a much older structure.
One of the local legends is that the pond in Queens Park was formed on top of a burial pit for the dead from the battle. At midnight on the 13th of May each year ghosts are said to rise up from the surface of the pond. I've had my own encounters with spirits here ............ there are several pubs in the immediate vicinity. ;)
 
Like everything else, you just have to read up on available sources, and kind of draw your own conclusions, especially for events that took place around 450 years ago that have been subject to much revision due to being handed down by word of mouth, and related by partisans of one side or the other. Out of necessity, otherwise I'd have written a book, I had to leave out a whole bunch of other stuff Del.

There was the Battle of Corriechie during the Queen's earlier adventures in NE Scotland when the 4th Earl of Huntly keeled over with a heart attack after the Gordon's futile charge against the Royalist forces.
A defeat that sealed the fate of Sir John Gordon who was subsequently executed at Aberdeen.
It also ensured that Mary lost the support of the leading Catholic family in the North-East, who were, you guessed it - the Gordon's.

I deliberately didn't touch on the fact that Kirkaldy of Grange was one of the leading Queen's men during the ensuing Marian Civil War in Scotland, despite holding high command in the rebel forces during the Battle of Langside.
Also, I forgot to mention the Earl of Argyle who was nominally in command of the Royalists at Langside - and who had the good sense to faint clean away just prior to the battle. I do wonder why? (sarcasm).
I'm unaware of the pond legend at Queen's Park, but used to be well aware of the pubs around Mount Florida and adjacent areas, albeit that was an awful long time ago.
:whistle:
 
Back
Top