The first news of Tartar Miniatures for September

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Sergey Savenkov

A Fixture
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
1,045
Location
Tresigallo-FE(Italia)
Good morning everyone!
I would like to present you the first news of Tartar Miniatures for September.
Warrior Piceno VI-V century BC
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piceni
Appear in 75 mm, white metal.
Sculpted by O. Pogosyan (Ukraine), painted by S. Popovichenko (Ukraine).
Mounting Kit includes two shields, two heads, one of them with removable helmet and two pairs of arms. Then the piece can be mounted in two versions: first as `el Piceno other greek warrior (or italics)
For historical research to the completion of Piceno want to thank Roberto Cianetti (Secutor).
Will be commercially available mid-September.
 

Attachments

  • SAM_0284копирование.jpg
    SAM_0284копирование.jpg
    151.1 KB
  • IMG_0113копирование.jpg
    IMG_0113копирование.jpg
    90.7 KB
  • IMG_0146копирование.jpg
    IMG_0146копирование.jpg
    78.2 KB
  • IMG_0169копирование.jpg
    IMG_0169копирование.jpg
    109 KB
  • korobka55.jpg
    korobka55.jpg
    199.2 KB
  • IMG_0205копирование.jpg
    IMG_0205копирование.jpg
    198.8 KB
  • publ.jpg
    publ.jpg
    201.3 KB
  • ыкопирование.jpg
    ыкопирование.jpg
    197.3 KB
  • IMG_0012копирование.jpg
    IMG_0012копирование.jpg
    90.2 KB
  • IMG_0203копирование.jpg
    IMG_0203копирование.jpg
    196.5 KB
I am pleased to announce my collaboration with Tartar Miniatures for this figure.
I already had followed the production of Tartar and I had understood the big potentiality about thematic “pre-roman warriors” and, when Sergey contacted me for a new figure that continues this series, I accepted his invitation.
Among the many possible subjects I chose a picenian warrior of VI/V Cent. B.C.; we disappoint at once “Fantasy”’s fans by saying that this is not a warrior from movie “Conan the Barbarian” but a real fighter of picenian culture of central Italy before the advent of the unifying power of Rome.
As my habit, a brief historical introduction and presentation of the documentation that led to the creation of this subject.
Note: all dates are B.C.
History.
It is assumed that the people who lived in present day regions of Marche and Abruzzo during the IX Cent. (Picenes - Plutarch, Picentes - Pliny, Polybius, Livy, Peucetians - Pseudo Scilace, Picentines - Strabo) was original of high Sabina, starts in response to a ritual migration and blended on site with achaean immigrants (Ancona - Ankòn - founded by Greek colonists, is called “Doric”); these peoples, whose name seems to mean “those of woodpecker” - the bird perched on their signs when they arrived at destination - (“Huius habitatores cum a Sabinis illuc properarent, in eorum vexillo picus consedit, atque hac de causa Picenus nomen accepit”, Paul. ex Fest. De verb. signif. 235 L - Historia Langobardorum II,19) - went in contact with villanovian culture at north and apulian culture at south; in the following centuries were increasingly intense influences of atesine culture (north), etruscan (west) and greek (through the Adriatic). All these contacts led to enrichment picenian culture in every field and, especially for our interest, in the military sector; figurate sources and funerary finds, in fact, show evidence of commingling italic (breast-plates and helmets) with greek types (corinthian helmets, greaves, armour and swords).
Documentation and realization.
The primary source from which the subject tract is the little bronze figure which adorns the handle of a vase of VI Cent. found in Treia (Macerata) and currently exposed in Pesaro (Library and Museums Oliveriani, photo 1); this man, on statuesque pose, holding his sides two horses and is virtually identical to the evidences from Belmonte Piceno (Tomba del Duce, first half VI Cent.), Tolentino (Tomba Porta del Ponte, first half VI Cent.) and Sirolo (second half VI Cent.) - pictures 1a and 1b by Author’s.
As you can see, this combination warrior/horses (so-called “Despòtes Tòn Hippòn” - “Lord of the Horses”) is an issue very often in picenian art and well shows ostentation of wealth of those, belonging to warrior aristocracy, could afford more than the rich bronze armies including the maintenance of horses. The element that struck me was the magnificent “horned” helmet wearing by fighter, naked, without greaves and only protected by a “bell” cuirass; this figure is virtually identical to the finds from Greece of Olympia and Aylos Kynouria (Osprey Elite Series 66, pages 5 and 63) with the only difference of helmets with ridges instead horns (and greaves): a valid reconstruction of this little statues is Fig. C1 of the same publication, that propose it as “Spartan King 6th Cent.”, with the only variation of the horizontal crest compared with original little bronzes. This diversity emphasize even more the picenian report confirming that the artist wanted to make evident the peculiarities of armour of this warrior. As seen, very often we come across specimens that reproduce fighters naked and/or wearing armour "over skin"; as well as our picenian warrior and the two bronzes mentioned we remember, for example, the “Dying Gaul” and “Capestrano’s Warrior”; we know that Gaesatoi fought so at Talamone, (Livy says that the Celts sometimes fought naked, “clothes only courage”, honor the gods), and in these cases there is no doubt that nudity must be seen as “deification” of warriors by artists.
We know that “horned” helmets, widespread in the ancient world, were used by Scandinavians, Celts, Achaeans, Shardana, Oscans and, just, Picenians; a specimen is clearly visible on much ruined tomb gravestone picture of IV Cent. in Via Crocefisso - Nola (picture 2); this cavalryman wears an “horned” Montefortino helmet whit a bronze horn and an iron horn (maybe no flat but conical?) but without “ears”; these appendages on picture are considered by some Italian modelists .... a kind of features stylized and/or idealized by sculptors and painters of ancient times!
I look for reports that confirm this structure and I recovered many imagines of similar “horned” helmets (greek style bronze “pilos” from Ruvo di Puglia, celtic and “Montefortino” types, etc.) but any identical, when I find a photo of an equal report than little bronze! I'm sorry cannot to document place of discovery and exposure of this report (picture 3, because photo is under copyright) but this subject, confirming the absolute reliability of ancient sources, deal a hard blow to those who store these curious “special” as fanciful art customs; in that regard, I forget the famous “Spittara’s stilts” (Magerius’s mosaic from Smirat, Tunisia - Sousse Museum Archéologique) and transparent t-shirt of Pompeii’s gladiators (tomb of C. Vestorius Priscus) that much ….. nervousness created in an Italian forum!
Here the helmet! Its morphology, although more bulky, is due to the model would evolved in such so-called "corinthian" type, in my opinion the most beautiful as a form of greek helmets; and this type was widespread in Italy (both in its original form that hybrid - etruscan-corinthian or apulian-corinthian) and, given the strictlying relations with the greek world, not surprising finding of these protections in the range in picenian burial tombs of time; outfits - of course - of individuals of high rank and high economic opportunities.
The structure of helmet is identical to specimen in London (VII Cent. - well reproduced in picture n° 8 page 61of “Greece and Rome at war”) with the outline that, from the point of a cheekguard to the other, maintains a straight profile with - strangely - a little resectable only near right ear! The dating of this report fits perfectly with the picenian handle and “horned” helmet. The helmet is surmounted by a pair of large horns - with two ears - attached to the tile (by pairs of brackets “L” riveted); watching the helmet is well known that these horns, flat and fluted, protruding tufts of hair hanging horses. The holes along the perimeter of the helmet - that served the attachment of padding - are clearly visible and these holes are present also on many greaves and breast-plates; it’s evident that metallic protections had inside stuffing of various materials, whether to avoid painful rubbing over skin that to mitigate received strokes; helmet and greave of this figure are intentionally proposed with evident outside lapel of this padding, fixed on metallic structure by seam.
The cuirass, as mentioned, is of “bell” type, with two shells held in place by fastenings passing into rings on the hips and shoulders, and eaves rather pronounced; seven good finds of this type, with eaves less clear, come from Marmesse (France) and are dated X-VIII Century; a beautiful report is from Argos, photo n° 17 page 53 in “Armi ed armature dei Greci”, reproduced in picture in “Greece and Rome at War” (figures 1-2, page 55).
The picenian “handle” figure has not greaves or shield and weapons (recovered in large numbers and types - straight or curved blade swords, daggers, spears and cusps and club heads!). Regarding the clubs, presumably symbols of authority comparable the scepters, it seems they were used by picenian warriors - unique in Italy - even as weapons of fight!
The soldier, therefore, was rebuilt with “bell” cuirass - worn over a tunic of heavy cloth, and thus little draped - “horned” helmet and deliberately, with only the left greave (by finding Campovalano, but those protections, individual and in pairs, albeit slightly later, are frequent in funerary reports from Numana, Novilara, Verrucchio and Ancona). For the realization of his tunic were used two bronzes in character from Roccaspinalveti; scholars discern in these figures as Frentani (or Carecini) warriors and both wearing helmets and greaves. 4a picture seems to wear a tunic perhaps padded with short sleeves and narrow at the waist by a belt, while 4b perhaps wearing a leather vest from which protrudes a short “pleated” skirt; clothing of this kind were much common during the fourth century and maybe already in use in the before centuries.
- end part 1

Sorry for my no good english and for any translation errors

It is forbidden to copy - partially or totally - of any written and pictorial (photos / drawings) part on Figurinitaly
 
In the documentation I found the outfits (as told to times just after) strangely are not shields, but it is logical to assume the use of these defensive elements; lack of discovery of these elements can be attributable to the fact that they were made of perishable materials (leather, wood, wicker, etc.) and this undoubtedly applies to the so-called “gun’s meat” (those individuals in low wealth and economic opportunities of which there are no burials) just fits for fighters buried with rich panoply: this absence remains a mystery, unless, as suppose, those protections were organic.
It is therefore possible that many warriors, though of high birth, taken a wooden covered leather shields without metal elements, and we have documentation of a singular model of curious “fiddle” shape from a vase fragment of middle VIII Cent. and a little bronze from Karditsa (VII Cent. - picture 5); these reports are in “Armi ed armature dei Greci” figures 12 and 16, and the bronze statue shows a figure, in character, all naked with only a belt and an helmet, take his shield an a shoulder belt (this warrior is proposed - full armed - in A2 of “The Spartan Army“); this shield, very popular in Greece during the VIII Cent. and plausibly arrived on the shores of the “Doric” Ancona to be taken by local fighters, derived from “8” type of Mycenaean memory and evolved in “Dipylon” shields from Athens.
In line with these assessments, I have designed for this warrior this type of shield (maybe of wicker and boiled leather cover?), very similar at report discovered at Treia, presumable imported from “Magna” Greece and now in Pesaro (Library and Museums Oliveriani); this handle vase (VI Cent.) shows a pair of warriors in action (Photo 2) and right figure embraces a shield of this shape on which two sphinxes are reproduced.
Given the large number of swords found - with curved blade (machaira) or straight (xiphos) - I was in doubt until the last with which to arm our model appear, and I decided to implement the specimens with curved blade of photo 3 (Recanati, Villa Teresa Tomb, early V Cent.); this is a weapon unusually long - about 90 cm. - and highly effective.
For the dagger, hanging on a chain and pendant at right side, was based on findings of photos 4 and 5 (copied in pictures 27 and 28-28a page 103 “Greece and Rome at War”); this report has a narrow blade and a curious pommel with “four stames”. It’s undoubted the use of belts, of which we have some bronze finds with still traces of stuffing (reports in Chieti Museum), but in this figure this accessory is invisible because under cuirass.
From funeral burials come also large quantities of bronze willow leaf expanded blades (with plug gun) of spear and spokes, but this warrior is not equipped with spear; I opted for the peculiar combat club. The heads of these weapons - about 6/7 cm of diameter - were generally mind of wood and reinforced with bronze friezes artistic worked (picture 6), but were found entirely different pieces of bronze (supplied by S. Severino); in our case the head is raised as all metal (photo 6, where graft is fixed to a wood “gun” handle) and the handle coated strings for best grip.
Curiouses, then, the bronze strengthening of sandals - of which also remains traces of wooden soles (photo 7); for the realization of these have been used this photo and the detailed description of Cianfarani (Op. cit.).
By photo we can see this structure, characterized by two bronze “half-moon” reinforces, one fore and one back - for a shaped protection of heels - both fixed to sole by nails. From Cianfarani: “During the excavation carried out in the necropolis of Capestrano was found a pair of sandals made of wood and bronze. Quite different from those worn by the Warrior, are composed of a rigid sole wood, bordered by a bronze band, who rose from the soil through eight spikes and sharp beak. Similar shoes to those of Capestrano come from the necropolis excavated in the district Fiorano of Loreto Aprutino. Too they are made of a rigid sole on the thickness of which is pinned a bronze band. The sole is based on a complex system of spikes that hold the high ground. Even the necropolis of Campovalano returned shoes similar to earlier, although the spikes protruding from the sole for almost five centimetres are made only by long nails. These shoes denounce use in a well-defined area, the current findings would lead to understanding between the pretutian territory - that is the province of Teramo - and the Pescara River. An explanation of their use may be in evidence, presumably similar, found in Belmonte Piceno on a chariot, but now extinct because of war events which succumbed to the Museum of Ancona”. The Dall 'Osso’s catalogue, in 1915, spoke of the elements iron silhouette of sandals “with large iron pins arranged around at the edge and confirmed the plan of the chariot” and speculated that “this species was probably used to sandals warrior to keep their feet and maintain balance on the floor of the chariot”.
The description of these metal strengthening confirms the structure of photo 7.
Remains of a metal wheel rims and many parts of horse’s harness were recovered in large numbers in picenian tombs and the fact those figures are shown with their animals confirms the hypothesis of the use of war chariots by picenian warriors; use that expected not only to move on the battlefield but as a weapon to break through enemy lines.
As seen, therefore, the remains of boots are not exactly the same as it is presumably dedicated to showing that the binding system was similar; it is based suggest, therefore, for these shoes a similar “set of fixes: at height of the heel and arch by the heads of two fixes that cross under malleolus; of them, the front running on top of the heel, which falls on a triangular tassel, and the back go up on the foot neck. A very faint trace on the left foot shows an other strap, the “giuggia”, current at the base of the fingers.” (Cianfarani, Op. Cit). From this finding, more or less contemporary and near to the picenian warrior also as geographical location, was then copied the system fixes, making the thickness of the sole with steeper to hear the application of “half-moon” reinforces; under the plant soles, of course not visible, it was useless play-put crampons.
Finally, some information about hairstyle and armilla (not realized).
Hairstyle has been copied from the loop by finding Treia of photo 2, where the two figures show long hair in "spiral" ringlets in "V" shape on the back, just like the greek bronzes from Aylos Kynouria and Olympia.
About ornament we know bracelets and necklaces were much widespread by men and women in italic peoples of centre Italy, as confirm figurate sources of Capestrano’s Warrior and Guardiagrele stele and that burial discoveries of armillae with knots and enriched accessories with amber.
For “wealth” of figure, if desired, buyer may be to realize by lead-leaf on right arm as bracelet with trapezoidal pendants of “Capestrano’s Warrior” (picture 7).

Some words about picture.
In ancient world dresses were dyed with natural pigments (of mineral and vegetal origin) fixed to cloths by urine. For this warrior, that already used bronze for metallic equipments, leather for shield, baldric and shoes, and wood for inside shield and scabbard plus incarnate, I have opted for grey - in different tonalities - for tunic and stuffing of helmet and greave; the horsehair of horns are painted in white.


Photos 1 - 2 from “Etruschi ed Italici prima del dominio di Roma” pages 108 and 120
Photos 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 from Author (machaira, dagger, reconstruction dagger, mace, greave and footwears)
Pictures 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 -7 from Author (handles, cavalryman from Nola, helmet, tunic, “8” shield, club’s head, armilla)
For helmet see “Greece and Rome at war” figure 8 page 45
For cuirass see “Greece and Rome at war” figures 1-2 pages 55

Bibliography

Etruschi ed Italici prima del dominio di Roma, R. Bianchi Bandinelli/A. Giuliano - BUR Rizzoli
Culture adriatiche antiche d’ Abruzzo e di Molise, V. Cianfarani - De Luca Editore
Gli antichi Piceni a Matelica, Silvestrini/Sabbatini - l’ “Erma” di Bretschneider
Armi ed armature dei greci - l’ “Erma” di Bretschneider
Adriatico tra VI e III sec. a.C. - l’ “Erma” di Bretschneider
Greci in Adriatico - l’ “Erma” di Bretschneider
Armi e Uniformi Vol. 1 - 2 – V. Melegari – Compagnia Generale Editoriale
Greece and Rome at war, P. Connolly, Black Cat Ed.
The Spartan Army - Osprey Elite Series 66
The Ancient Greeks - Osprey Elite Series 7
The Myceneans c. 1650-1100 B.C. - Osprey Elite Series 130
Early Roman armies - Osprey MAA 283

Sorry for my no good english and for any translation errors

It is forbidden to copy - partially or totally - of any written and pictorial (photos / drawings) part on Figurinitaly
 

Attachments

  • photo 2.jpg
    photo 2.jpg
    27.8 KB
  • photo 5.jpg
    photo 5.jpg
    29 KB
  • photo 4.jpg
    photo 4.jpg
    21.3 KB
  • photo 3.jpg
    photo 3.jpg
    24.9 KB
  • photo 1.jpg
    photo 1.jpg
    58.6 KB
  • photo 6.jpg
    photo 6.jpg
    21.1 KB
  • photo 7.jpg
    photo 7.jpg
    23.9 KB
  • pict1a.jpg
    pict1a.jpg
    39.8 KB
  • pict1b.jpg
    pict1b.jpg
    32.2 KB
  • pict2.jpg
    pict2.jpg
    33.8 KB
  • pict3.jpg
    pict3.jpg
    32.1 KB
  • pict4.jpg
    pict4.jpg
    18.8 KB
  • pict5.jpg
    pict5.jpg
    13.2 KB
  • pict6.jpg
    pict6.jpg
    17.5 KB
  • pict7.jpg
    pict7.jpg
    11.2 KB
Back
Top