I suspect this is based on Sir John Codderington see below at Agincourt by the lions
Linked plate belts while uncommon are known as far back as the Viking era, and that's why I said suspect not it is as re the lions
I think Barton did a mounted Sir John Codrington in 90mm.
Mike
..., it's based on that picture too.
Thanks for the comment, but I don't know what Peter Morton used for the chain mail, I don't think he had available a lady's purse he could use ;-) I think he just sculpted it in by hand, I don't know. I think once this piece is painted by someone more talented than me it would look good.Very nice but the mail is very poor. I used proper mail from a 1920's lady's purse for my 200mm knight: https://www.planetfigure.com/threads/200-mm-medieval-knight.116811/
Mike
It looks only half-finished to me. And the shield appears to be stuck to the back of his hand via a large magnet.
Has some potential if it's only a W.I.P. Otherwise I'm unimpressed, sorry. As it is now, it looks more like a child's toy knight.
- Steve
Looks like the Barton one is based on the picture: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/90mm-barton-miniatures-sir-john-310525260
The new one clearly isn't (in terms of his armour at least).
In fact it's more like this one from legion: https://www.treefrogtreasures.com/p-12124-kings-standard-bearer-sir-john-codrington.aspx
Either way the arms are missing a lion and bar (unless they're yet to be added) and my comments about other parts remain.
What I must stress is that I wish Tigerdio the best of luck and I'm sure this will end up as a superb piece
Looking good, a great head and a massive 200mm/8" high!
I assume that this is still a WiP but at this scale you'd expect to see every strap, buckle, tie, hook, hinge and rivet!
So, I assume that these will be added.
In the meantime I agree with Mike ref the mail (especially the lower edge where the zig-zag is created by round links not a pretty-well straight edge as shown). Also check out how by this later period, the mail aventail was attached to the bascinet's rim via a system of staples and lacing.
Also: the belt looks rather clumsy-as I understand it, this would normally be a leather belt with applied plates/plaques rather than what looks like rather thick linked plates; the patterning on the belt and helmet wreath look as if they're just jabbed in with a pointed implement; the sabatons should be segmented, not solid plates; the raised lions look overdone* (always an issue, to leave plain, engrave or emboss... I'd go for plain or light engraving); their positioning also looks strange, especially on the jupon (is there a bend or something that runs between them?).
The strapping on the rear of the shield also need some research (although I realise that this may just be blu-tacked on for the photos?).
There are plenty of refs (published and online) for all of these.
All offered as honest feedback, advice and critique, not criticism of what looks as if it could end up to be a stunning piece.
Neil
These are some photos of the back detail.
*Raised/embossed items did exist, especially for padded jupon/gambesons and display shields (eg see Edward, The Black Prince's funeral achievements) but as I understand it, actual combat shields would just have a painted cloth or leather covering. The impression of embossed items perhaps comes from memorial sculptures where low relief was a convenient way of showing the arms' charges (brasses were of course engraved, but that doesn't mean that actual shields were).
Hi Steve,
Yes linked belts did exist (I beleive that the Romans also used them?) but, as you say they were not as common.... that's why I said they'd 'normally be a leather belt with applied plates/plaques...' (either way I think this one isn't terribly well executed).
BTW: just noticed that your repro pic is in fact a belt with plates on top (I recognise this from the buckle on a brass somewhere):
View attachment 380852
I'm not sure what you mean by '...that's why I said suspect not it is as re the lions'?
Neil
Looks like the Barton one is based on the picture: https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/90mm-barton-miniatures-sir-john-310525260
The new one clearly isn't (in terms of his armour at least).
In fact it's more like this one from legion: https://www.treefrogtreasures.com/p-12124-kings-standard-bearer-sir-john-codrington.aspx
Either way the arms are missing a lion and bar (unless they're yet to be added) and my comments about other parts remain.
What I must stress is that I wish Tigerdio the best of luck and I'm sure this will end up as a superb piece