fogie
A Fixture
I am in a bit of a dilemma. I've been following the cuurent WIP article about Sgt. Ewart.s capture of the 45th Eagle
and a couple of points have been troubling me. As I'm particularly anxious not to imply any criticism of the work
of the painter, I thought to post this here as a general query on historical accurracy about the Scots Greys.
I've always understood that Napoleonic British cavalry horses had docked tails - and although I can't be certain
from the posted photos, this one looks decidedly long. Secondly, and more significant, is Ewart's carbine belt.
Sergeants and Officers were not issued with the Paget carbine, so would Ewart heve worn the belt ? Clearly the
painter is not responsible in any way for these anomalies and I would be most disturbed in anyone considered
it so.
Have I put myself in the way of some off-centre information here - in other words, have I got this wrong and does it
really matter?
and a couple of points have been troubling me. As I'm particularly anxious not to imply any criticism of the work
of the painter, I thought to post this here as a general query on historical accurracy about the Scots Greys.
I've always understood that Napoleonic British cavalry horses had docked tails - and although I can't be certain
from the posted photos, this one looks decidedly long. Secondly, and more significant, is Ewart's carbine belt.
Sergeants and Officers were not issued with the Paget carbine, so would Ewart heve worn the belt ? Clearly the
painter is not responsible in any way for these anomalies and I would be most disturbed in anyone considered
it so.
Have I put myself in the way of some off-centre information here - in other words, have I got this wrong and does it
really matter?