I for one think painting too deep contrasts makes the face look clownish.
Bob! .. Could you give us an example or two, (in picture format?) of what you actually mean,? and then your preferred contrast?. All faces are different, as are the individual painters skill in portraying this aspect.
Don't get me wrong, there are some very animated faces submitted now and again, but there is also some sublime work! Which I could never achieve! .. but is this not the, 'Learning Curve' which we all go through?. PF, is not as elitist, as 'Putty& Paint'.
Regards,
Mark
And I agree about 'puttyandpaint'. I had to chuckle at the statement in their FAQs that their "invitation only" policy is (quote) "not an elitist thing"- it's just to "maintain the quality and scale" of the site. In other words .... no mediocre riff-raff allowed!!
- Steve
Have to agree.
- Steve
Am just curious...why does it seem that miniature face painting often has really contrasting shading? Almost an overdone aspect? Under the eyes, the nose, the chin...seems, to me, almost comical. Isn't a more subtle shading more realistic?
A lot of painting is now done for the camera esp the box art stuff , also there are a few who digitally enhance there work ,some look great on camera and no so in reality but it works the other way also, painters with little camera skills tend to lose out on the picture post .
I have seen some stuff that looks extremely good on picture and is so much better in reality .
I have had my suspicions there also Steve , re eye paintingWithout naming any names, I have seen a few postings during the time I've been on here and on other figure forums in which I've strongly suspected Photoshop sleight of hand or some other jiggery-pokery (highly detailed, perfectly painted eyes even down to tiny catchlights in 54 mm? ... gimme a break!)
The point you make about photography is also a valid one Ron - it can both flatter and deceive, or not do a piece justice at all.
- Steve
A lot is done these days to appear good under digital photography. Apparently many shades & highights are lost in this that the naked eye sees.
A lot is to do with current trends, which are dominated by Italian & Spanish painters. All very talented, don't get me wrong.
Much of the painting we see in competitions I reckon is done to look good under lighting conditions you are likely to see in comp rooms. Euro is an excellent example of this. The comp room tends to be unbelieveably bright. The top painters compensate for this accordingly. Often as well, we see box art pieces at Euro, and figures are painted to make this look 'better'.
There is a middle ground, which is what I tend to persue (badly....)