Angaliel,
I'm sorry you have taken offence at Steve's and my comments which were meant to be helpful.
The bust looks very much like a Sikh or a Punjabi but it is not a Gurkha.
Firstly the facial features are of an Indian, and very much like that of a Sikh. Sikhs wore turbans and beards and were recruited from NW India. Gurkhas wore the slouch hat in 1914, did not wear beards and were recruited from Nepal. They are quite a different race of people altogether as can be seen from the photos below.
Bengal Native infantry are not Gurkhas, they are Indians. Bengal is part of Eastern India, and are a different race of people to the Gurkhas.
Attached is a photo of Gurkhas in 1896 wearing the pillbox hat and another of Gurkhas supposedly in France 1914/15 wearing the slouch hat.
Jehan17's photo shows what appears to be one Gurkha (wearing the slouch hat), the others are Indians (wearing turbans).
This is not meant to criticise the very fine work you have done but to correct a misconception that the bust is of a Gurkha in 1914. If JMD has described this a Gurkha then they have got it wrong, you can see the Nepalese (Gurkhas) have quite different facial features.
Regards
Chris
PS. This site shows a number of photos of Gurkhas.
http://www.himalayan-imports.com/gurkha.html
PPS. The JMD model is actually marketed as a "Sikh 1914"
http://www.coloradominiatures.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=4829