You right Jay. But what I think they were trying to achieve is a "stylized" version of the great Murat. It reminds me of Confederate General Longstreet's monument at Gettysburg.
Not for everyone for sure, but this is art...Pure art! Like Joe said, note how clean everything is. A true connoisseur collectors piece. Much like the Russian style. I love it! We need more of this.
Like a mammoth of the hobby was reported to have once said "It's not about accuracy, it's about art". Or something to that effect.
Beautiful work on this figure...superbly done. Top notch painting.
Interesting comments....especially the "mammoth" statement. I wonder if that particular mammoth was ever a judge....
During a competition, I had entered what I thought was a pretty good example of a mounted Hun. Now Hunnic ponies (basically Prezewalski's horse) were really quite small (my research showed), with pot bellies a hooked head, and stout necks... so I sculpted it that way. Literally, the rider's legs almost scrape the ground sometimes.
Later on, after the awards, I was told (on the sly, mind you) that the piece was very well done; sculpting, painting, presentation, blah , blah... but it didn't win a higher award because the judges couldn't get around the fact that the horse was so small.
Now to go and corner a judge or judges and explain to him/them all about Hunnic ponies and their size is just not what you do. But after you work painstakingly on a piece, literally for months, you don't want to crash and burn over ignorance to accuracy, either.
The point being...art for art's sake is wonderful, I agree. I'm at the point where I would do anything that came into my head...and damn the consequences. That was then, this is now.
But there's always that monster in the corner...
Just thought I'd share that. Anyone else ever have a similar experience?
How do others feel about artistic form over accuracy in miniatures?