Well, not so rich vikings may very well have looked just like this. But the weapon was usually an axe then rather than a sword given the difference in price between the two. And also how divers an axe would when the sword is just used for fighting.
The local levys(Hird) consisted of ordinary farmers who only served as warriors in time of need. Or when second or third son joined up with local traders/raiders as there where no land for them to inherit. Especially before AD 850, before the big viking fleets going to France(Frankland), Germany(Saxland), England, Ireland or Spain, the raids where not organized and more the work of a local prospector who wanted to gain riches and respect.
What I think is overdone on most norse figures for the late ironage is the figure being furclad. Fur was not usually worn in that manner and not in cloaks. And if so, only in wintertime. And I mean real winter time with +40cm of snow and temperatures below -5 degres Ceclius. The use of fur for more like blankets, and used in beds, chairs and the alike.
So for all of you manufacturers. Lose the friggin fur. With the exception for some decoration on helmets, headwear, scabbards etc.
In this perticular figure I would like to see the hair and moustache a bit more defined. Im thinking of buying it but I will surely try to lose the fur cloak or at least sand it down to make it look like wool.
Cheers
Janne Nilsson