Dear Mr Stout,
My name is John Curran, and I am just sending a reply with regard to your post; You were correct about my `L` Battery model and my model shop in Monton (although I had it for four years not three - and an experience I would sooner forget).
However I am writing in about what you said about the `14th century Knight` model.
Departing from my usual plasticine modelling, this was made from Historex parts in order to enter a specific Historex competition at the time - and it came second in its class. It went on to do very well at Northern Militaire - I can`t fully remember now, but I think it won the 54mm mounted class in 1982 which made it eligible to enter the Supreme Champion Trophy (specifically for previous winning models) the following year - 1983.
So I did and it won that as well.
Your comment about it receiving criticism was correct up to a point, but the way you have phrased it makes it sound as if I dropped out of modelling as a direct consequence of that criticism, which was not the case at all, so I am just writing in to correct that. It had nothing to do with my disappearance from the modelling scene.
There was also nothing like the amount of criticism which you suggest the model received. I distinctly remember that it revolved mainly around the comments of one person, who had a real go at me one time in the `Reader`s comments page or ` Postbag` section of the Military Modelling magazine shortly afterwards. Realistically, his criticism was based on 99% sarcasm and 1% constructive, and all because I made the mistake of not putting buttons down the figure`s back (or something along those lines). Whatever it was modelling wise, it was a minor and careless omission on my part, and I wrote back and thanked him for pointing it out and correcting me, but suggested that he could have done it a lot less aggressively and sarcastically.
It was a storm in a teacup, but whoever it was who wrote in to MM turned it into a nuclear strike.
It also had nothing to do with the heraldry being - as you put it - `all wrong` - which as far as I am still aware was correct.
All the best,
John Curran