Roman Cavalryman - Seil Miniatures

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Guy

A Fixture
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
12,741
Location
US, Oklahoma
SH75013
Roman Cavalryman, 4th century AD
75mm White Metal
Sculpted by Sergey Zlobov
Painted by Lee Sang Eon
25 parts

1326.jpg

Sergey Zlobov's newest 75mm figure produced by Seil Miniatures depicts a Roman Cavalryman in battle. The figure kit consists of 25 total parts sandwiched between layers of foam for protection. It comes with a beautiful color guide for painting reference.

fig 1a.JPG

Above are all the parts to the kit laid out so that you can see the what the kit consists of.

The Figure


fig 02.JPG

Above are the 8 basic parts of the cavalryman consisting of the head, upper torso, waist section of the torso, 2 arms, 1 hand and 2 legs. The horse's saddle is sculpted into the waist section.

fig 03.JPG fig 05.JPG

fig 04.JPG fig 06.JPG

Above are the four sides of the head showing the attention to detail Sergey has sculpted into this figure.

fig 07.JPG fig 09.JPG

fig 08.JPG

Above are three views of the upper chest armor.

[ continued in next posting ]

 
fig 10.JPG fig 12.JPG

fig 11.JPG fig 13.JPG

Above are four views of the waist section showing the leather armor and the saddle sculpted into the rider. There are 2 casting blocks on the top that need to be removed.

fig 14.JPG fig 15.JPG

Above is the front and rear view of the right arm. The hand is cast separately.

fig 16.JPG fig 17.JPG

Above is the left arm with the hand sculpted to the arm.

fig 18.JPG fig 19.JPG

fig 20.JPG

Above are the legs which attach to the hip section. The bottom photo shows the attention to detail Sergey has shown to the detail of the sandals.

[ continued in next post ]

 
fig 21.JPG fig 21a.JPG

Above are the accessories , shield, sword, lance tip and end and the steel rod for the lance. Sheet lead is also provided for the reins and stirrups. The right photo shows the reverse side of the sword and shield.

The Horse

Horse 01.JPG

Above are the basic parts to the horse. Seil has improved the casting of the horse by inserting larger steel rods into the feet that touch the ground for increased better support.

Horse 02.JPG Horse 03.JPG

Horse 04.JPG Horse 05.JPG

Above are the outside and inside of the horse halves.

Horse 06.JPG Horse 09.JPG

Horse 07.JPG Horse 08.JPG

Above you can see the head of the horse and the attention to muscular detail Sergey has sculpted into the horse. The forelock and ears are cast separately.

[ continued in next post ]

 
fig 22.JPG

Above is the white metal base with locater holes for the horse's 2 rear legs. Also the brass etched plaque for the finished wood base.

color guide.jpg

Above is the color guide for painting reference.

Additional Box art photos

1327.jpg 1329.jpg

1330.jpg

1331.jpg 1332.jpg

Conclusion:
An excellent 75mm figure with slight casting lines. Several mold blocks need to be removed from the waist section. Excellent dry fitting of parts. Highly recommended.

Seil Miniatures web site
click here

R195
 
Hi Guy,

Thanks for the review.

As you have had this figure in your hands I am sure you will be able to help me out on the following question: from the first moment I saw the figure to me it looked as if the breastplate (lorica musculata) of the rider has a certain degree of torsion. Maybe it is an optical illusion as a result of the right arm stretchting out backwards preparing to launch the spear, but if not, then it is a serious flaw as unlike mail armour this kind of armour would not bend under the movements of the body wearing it.

Otherwise this seems to be a very crisply moulded kit.

Johan
 
The breast plate is the same off each shoulder. (looking at the part now). What you see must be the photography, lighting or painting. Hope this helps.
 
Friends - not sports, I heard this question earlier, the size of a shoulder identical, but the right party{side} really has few{not enough;poorly} change a corner of an inclination - if it appreciablly on a figure it is my mistake of the author of model.
Thanks for your comments, yours faithfully.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top