TURN-Washington's spies, epaulet tale

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joking aside, I just had an audacity to ask the question about historical reference on TURN's official Facebook page...

I must admit I failed to resist pointing out resemblance to a male reproductive organ (in most polite and scientific terms)

Rather surprisingly, my post was removed within 2 minutes, but may be they will send me a PM. I will let you know as soon as I hear more... I can't wait, I am so excited...:nailbiting:


(y) Just had a look and your question is still there. :wideyed: Eagerly awaiting a response.... this should be good.
 
Does anyone know if the epaulettes are HISTORICALLY CORRECT? Everyone knows that it is the important thing. Perhaps the term rivet counting should be changed to nut counting for this example.

No they are hysterically correct (anatomically)
You can see the care labelif you look carefully
Mens:
medium :
wash with mild detergent
drip dry only

Paul
 
Those patterned epaulettes are historically correct, one of my towns fore fathers created the design and this is the inspiration for it............for some strange reason I have an inkling to sing that old chimp classic..........now I'm the king of the swingers and jungle VIP!
Ape.png
 
Back
Top