For me, this is a missed opportunity.
Historical perspective: don't know enough about the period and/or persona to comment, but is that REALLY a queen's helmut? If yes, then I stand corrected.
Artistic perspective: I'm not getting a "Queen of the Britons" vibe from this sculpt. What is the artist trying to tell us? What am I missing?
Technical perspective: from the well-done photos (both prior sculpt and present painted version), the casting and painting seem to be skillfully produced. In today's market, I would expect nothing less.
Business perspective: For me as a consumer/potential customer, this is where the miss occurred. If I saw this bust on a show table, I'd admire it, and move on. Not my particular interest, but I could appreciate the work involved.
On the other hand, as a commercial piece, there's nothing about this offering that would induce me to 1) purchase it, 2) paint it, and/or 3) display it. Where's the regal bearing? Where's the strength of personality that allowed this historical woman to lead and command men? Weak neck, tilted helmut, strange, almost vacant facial expression . . . this is the image of a leader?
If a figure producer wishes to cater to the T&A crowd (of which I occasionally count myself a member), one would be better advised to look up Mike Crusinelli (sp?), and try to reissue his pieces from the late 1990s and early 2000s.
So for me, this fails both as a historical person bust, and as a titillation subject. My dollars will not be spent on this offering.
Now, I understand that I may hold a minority opinion here, and this piece may, in fact, sell very well. For the producer, I hope that it does so.
Regardless of one's opinion, and regardless of how many copies actually get sold to painters (not distributors/shops), it will be interesting to see if this bust appears at any or many of the 2012 shows.