The sculpting is world-class, worthy of the highest praise and I'll certainly be purchasing this bust when it comes out.
Like Waterman, I have a somewhat jaundiced view of Churchill, the wartime leader and strategist, and have read several books on the subject of his strained relationships with the Australian wartime Prime Ministers' Robert Menzies and John Curtin, particularly "The Great Betrayal". I have no wish to throw fuel on the fire, but Waterman expresses a view that many Australian's share, that Churchill promised that the British Empire would defend Australia in return for Australia sending ALL its armed forces overseas to fight the Germans, and then reneged on that promise of Imperial Protection and tried to prevent the Australian Government returning its forces to defend Australia against the threat of Japanese invasion. The invasion never happened, in part because of the US naval victory in the battle of Coral Sea and also because of the return of the AIF to Australia just in time to fight the Battle of Kokoda.
It's a moot point now, but at the time the threat of invasion was real and several attacks, including bombing raids on Darwin and northern ports and attacks in Sydney Harbour by Japanese midget submarines, made the liklihood of invasion very real. With virtually all our trained soldiers, sailors and airmen and all their equipment overseas fighting the Germans, Australia was completely unable to defend itself. When Singapore fell, Churchill's guarentee of Imperial Protection became an empty promise. No doubt in the larger scheme of things, this was a matter that concerned Churchill less than the defence of the British Isles against the Luftwaffe and preventing India falling into the hands of the Japanese. Such are the fortunes of war. The less said about the merits of the Gallipoli Campaign the better. Everyone deserves their fair share of criticism for that disaster!
There's no doubt a very interesting and heated historical argument that could be had about the merits of Churchill's legacy (one that I'd love to get into), but that belongs on a separate thread.
That debate shouldn't overshadow the reality that this bust of Churchill is unquestionably the best miniature likeness ever produced of the man, and is destined to become a classic. I can see the tables of every modelling competition around the world covered in examples of this bust in the coming years.