- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,034
Kazuc is quite entitled to voice his opinion and has given the reasons why he doesn't like the painting of the figure, what's so wrong with that?
I accept not everyone will agree with him but perhaps it would be more productive if the defenders of the piece stated what is so good about it rather than attacking Kazuc for daring to say what he think
Roger.
I don't think anyone has said he's not entitled to an opinion have they?
It's not so much what he says as the way that he says it. There's nothing wrong with constructive criticism at all, but when a new member signs up and their first "contribution" is to come on here and start slagging stuff off, it tends to set off my "troll alarm".
- Steve