Two new muses: Flora and Médée

planetFigure

Help Support planetFigure:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yep, La fidele for sure.

I think ranges such as this have to be a little bit careful in their subjects as they can veer towards mere titillation (literally).

I know there are several ranges of 'erotic' figs (OK if that's your thing and it keeps you off the streets) and I once stumbled across a site with works from a Spanish female painter of very explicit female figs whose skintone skills were fantastic, as well as her ability to paint the parts other painters cannot reach (if you get my drift).
 
Thank you for your comments :)



I saw several models but in lower scale and very different from the John Collier painting ... but I may have missed one..?
I am not 100% It may have been a conversion possibly,or even this cake :eek:
JS77083141.jpg
 
See where I said it was a cake? I am also aware of the statue thanks.

Yes, I sort of expected that you knew that I knew that you knew (a feeble attempt at a joke: my wife tells me to stop even trying, it only embarrasses me/her :oops: ).

I added the Coventry statue simply as a conversational alternative (and I think better than the painting, though in a more modern style), tho' I suppose it doesn't fit your C19th painting criterion... however, neither does the Friant one (painted 1921).

Anyway, as I said, the range is a great idea as long as it doesn't become mere erotic titillation (tho' that may sell better... and the manufacturers of plain brown paper would benefit (there I go, making c**p attempts at jokes again :wacky: )
 
First wave of suggestions from the backers :)
"The Charmer" by J.W.Waterhouse

ef5a6e0f22cb22745a019b6b9cfd0310_original.jpg

Judith à la Couronne" by Charles Zacharie Landelle
0500a7efac9cfe371cd12f5a293e9cfc_original.jpg

"La femme au perroquet" by Gustave Courbet
312a86c574e3eaaecdab61923187113d_original.jpg


At the Edge of the Brook” by William Bouguereau

feecb2ee3d62e803123e4683e838a6ae_original.jpg

 
Paintings have always inspired figure sculptors but we seem to see a steadily growing number actually representing fine art paintings these days.
Clearly it's become a popular genre which is quite understandable when you see these - they're quality is undeniable.

Painting figures of this sort requires us to make a fundamental decision...do we copy the finished artwork or do we regard the figure as the artist's
living model posing in the studio? One choice rather limits our freedom a bit for we must follow the artist's lead, but the other allows us a better
chance of more realism. For me the choice is easy - paint the figure as the artist's living model.

Mike

PS With Alphonse Mucha's 'Medee' we're lucky that the delectable Miss Bernhardt's
wooden leg is mercifully covered !
 
I fully understand the appeal of the late 19th century 'romantics' for this range - not least, I suppose, because of copyright issues.
But as much as I personally enjoy the work of those artists, I think they are a bit limiting for the painter of figures.

Does anyone care for these as alternatives? They are by Giuseppe Dangelico (1939 – 2010) an Italian artist who worked under the
name of Pino Daeni, and known primarily for his Impressionist paintings and book illustrations.

pino1.jpgpino2.jpgpino5.jpgpino6.jpg

Mike
 

Latest posts

Back
Top