Okay, back to the beginning! My prior comments were mostly in response to what Brain had said in his initial post.
So, to get to the topic at hand: The state of the art on this hobby has never been better. As others have pointed out technology and techniques have evolved over time - and all for the best for the most part. I have previously mentioned that I do question current fashions in painting which emphasize extreme contrast, thus elevating what I feel is extreme over-painting to the percieved "pinnacle" of the art.
As with all fashions, this one is only temporary and hopefully will be replaced by something less offensive to my personal sensibilities. If not, then my personal tastes shall only fall ever-further out of favor. C'est la vie!
I AM intrigued by digital sculpting. This seems like a new tool which could, potentially be at the forefront of a revolution in sculpting. But, to be honest, I have yet to see any digital sculpts here that knocked my socks off. But I hold no illusions that genius in digital form will show up sooner or later under the guise of pairing the right talent with the technology. I would love to take it up, if only I can get off the treadmill my analog work has created - where I have no "extra" time to do things other than sculpt masters in order to pay the bills and keep the ever ravening wolves from my door.
Hi
Airbrushing is one aspect of the hobby that ,although very good, doesn't sit well with me .I have no qualms about using it as an aid, but when you can watch on You Tube a horse being almost totally painted with an airbrush, except maybe the eyes and the hoofs for example,and figures especially busts that i've seen, being painted much the same way doesn't turn me on i'm afraid . I quote Mike Good
- "To my mind, the only thing that counts is the final result. If I can find easier ways to achieve an end result, then that is working smart - not cheating! "
By saying this, Mike more or less states, that it's easier to airbrush.In Mikes defence to be fair, as he was, and still is a commercial painter, where easier and obviously speedier methods would be a boon.
I much prefer to sit on my own,taking as much time as i want to paint a figure,as to me,that's part of the enjoyment.
Brian
Sorry Brian, I have to respond here as, this last statement of yours simply is not true! To call me a "commercial painter" is completely out of touch with reality. For one thing, I can count all the figures I have painted in this current century on one hand - and still have fingers left over! For another, I cannot remember the last time I sold a painted figure. It certainly was sometime in the last century. How such a meager and completely unpatronized output can qualify as "commercial" is beyond me.
As stated above, I get little time to paint these days. And when I do, I must force myself to sit down and do it. And then, I inevitably have to put the poor pitiful thing away (i get so little practice that I am perpetually "rusty" - not to mention I am still coming to terms with an entirely new - to me - paint medium) in order to pump out another sculpted master so I can pay the rent. That hardly qualifies me as a painter, much less a "professional" one that actually gets paid for their efforts. If the response to my measly output at the last two shows is any indication, my days as a "collectible" painter are already numbered.
But, to answer Brian's comments about airbrushing figures, two things need to be kept in mind:
1.) My airbrushing technique is more like "point and shoot" than any highly finessed "art" technique. I developed it more as a way to speed up the process of painting large scale figures. I found this necessary because my normal brush painting techniques were so slow that I found it difficult to finish them at all - I would lose interest in the project long before I could call it done. I could never have painted any 1/6th or 1/9th scale figures without the airbrush helping to push the work along. Even 120mm figures take too long for me to do by hand.
2.) As such, my airbrush technique falls squarely into the category of "working smart", rather than toward any incorrectly perceived "commercial" motive. As I said previously, some of us prefer to make our life easier if there are obvious ways to do that. I have little interest in being an artistic "purist" if the end result is no better and it makes things more difficult in the long run. I will leave the voluntary hair-shirting to others - as I always have......
This dinosaur still has a lot to learn. And I will, no doubt, remain interested in this hobby as long that is true.
Happy modeling!
Mike