Marc, I do not understand your comment. If a Ronin was originally a samurai and then became masterless but did not committ suicide - he would still have access to all his samurai armour and swords etc. Disgraced yes but not necessarily without armour and weapons??
Ciao
Franco
Because when a Samurai became a Ronin he has no more then his underwear.
Marc
If a Ronin was originally a samurai and then became masterless but did not committ suicide - he would still have access to all his samurai armour and swords etc. Disgraced yes but not necessarily without armour and weapons??
Franco
Marc's comment may sound outrageous but it's closer to the truth than most may think.
Bushi (warriors) and samurai (retainers) relied on their master for food, lodging and clothing.
At the demise of their employer – be it by disgrace, death, or bankruptcy – they were deprived of their sole source of income and thus found themselves unemployed and without a social status.
Most owned nothing but the clothes (and underwear ) they're wearing and their weapons. Some were so desperate that they ended up selling their swords and replacing them by bamboo makeshifts.
These were desperate men despised (and feared) by a highly and rigidly-structured society.
HTH
Quang
it is possible that a ronin it had those armour and weapons?