gordy
A Fixture
What Tamiya parts? I am not copying them, I only used them as a jumping off point for my own "versions" of them. If you compare the original parts and my heavily modified parts, they are no longer the same. I would not have used the original plastic parts for any model of mine. They simply were not up to snuff. I only used them to speed up a process which would have taken at least twice the time otherwise. In the case of the gas mask canister, I could not have made a decent one at all because I do not have a lathe and am not a machinist.
I completely feel that.. timeliness and deadlines are huge factors also.
Really? Who made those rules? I am a modeler and the only thing that matters is the final result. If there is an easier and better way to get a good result, then I will use it. If certain purists think that is cheating, then the problem is only in their mind as far as I am concerned.
The only rule I ever experienced was at Verlinden and VLS yet it was more of a guide.. when doing masters for armour, accessories and planes there was an industry wide gentleman's understanding of the ``70% ', modifying a commercial piece 70% is acceptable in reuse.
I feel that easing my job, or creating short cuts to obtain a better final result is working smart. To my mind it is foolish to deliberately make a job more difficult - especially if nobody is paying me for all of that extra time invested.
Well put
No boost-up parts and this thread and this discussion would never have happened....
Well don't stop the thread now- it would be like canceling a t.v. show mid-season!
Resourcefulness is the modelers greatest asset.
The ability to "see" items inside of other items or mundane house hold items, or improve upon stock items is something to be extolled and not challenged.
Now back to Mike's topic...